Sunday, 5 June 2011

Why is Spain’s generous welfare system seen as a problem?

The extract mentions that Spain, fearing the social consequences of high unemployment as a result of the recession, has opted to increase unemployment benefits. This means that annual government spending on unemployment benefits now account for over 3% of Spain's total GDP. That figure is huge when put in context; especially when we consider that the stability and growth pact (as discussed in an earlier post) allows no more than a 3% total spending deficit annually.

This is certainly seen as a rather large problem, as high levels of government spending are difficult to sustain, as they have to be financed with lots of borrowing. Similarly, the money could be spent on something else, such as healthcare (opportunity cost is a common criticism of any government spending).

Furthermore, a generous welfare state often leads to dependence of people on those benefits, as well as a reluctance to find work - known as the unemployment trap. The unemployment trap is a big problem for governments as the dependence it creates can easily lead to longer-term unemployment problems, with people becoming used to being unemployed, as well as becoming unemployable as they lose their skills, along with the routine of getting up to work etc.

5 comments:

  1. "... fearing the social consequences of high unemployment as a result of the recession, has opted to increase unemployment benefits. "

    Evaluation:

    So INCREASE benefits? increase the attractiveness of being unemployed?

    How does the increase encourage people to look for work?

    ReplyDelete
  2. It doesn't encourage people to look for work, but the "social consequences" they fear were ones like alcohol abuse and violence etc. Ones that stem from people being poor.. Essentially they feared poverty.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Let me see if I understand this correctly.

    Alcohol is not free - right?

    If you have more money (and time and no responsibility) you can buy more alcohol - right?

    So raising benefits reduces alcohol abuse?

    ReplyDelete
  4. It reduces alcohol abuse by reducing depression and things that make people turn to alcohol..

    NB. Almost all tramps are alcoholics, and they aren't exactly rich are they..?

    ReplyDelete
  5. 'Alcohol abuse and violence' many of the young people, drunk, fighting in the streets are quite well off i.e. they have funds to buy the booze. Maybe not alcoholic but certainly abusing alcohol.

    Cut their discretionary income and alcohol consumption could well fall.

    These people are not depressed - they're having a great time as they vomit in the street.

    http://www.caterersearch.com/blogs/catering-news-blog/2008/03/darling-puts-up-beer-tax-1.html

    ReplyDelete